Deer Farmer

Go Back   Deer Farmer > Deer Farming Forum > Cervid Industry

Cervid Industry Cervid Industry Forum - share, discuss, and debate important issues and matters within the cervid industry


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes

Old Aug 14th 2014, 04:25 AM   #1
 
  Nov 2012
  Garnett, Kansas


18px 24pxFenced Hunting Doesn’t Spread Disease


Printed in the IndyStar

July 30, 2014



Skip Hess shot wide of the mark in his column that condemned hunting deer inside fenced preserves (“Blame the hunters in the captive deer controversy”). For starters, these operations are large and can be hundreds of acres and in many cases thousands of acres in size, allowing for a “fair chase” hunt and the ability of the animal to escape. Because they are private facilities, they are more appropriately regulated by the agriculture department and not the natural resources department.


Hess is mistaken to imply that these operations are a worrisome risk for spreading chronic wasting disease. There are strong regulations in place to mitigate the risk of spreading CWD by transporting deer. The U.S. Department of Agriculture requires deer farms that want to ship animals interstate to test all eligible mortalities for a minimum of five years before they are eligible to ship interstate, and then continue testing at that level to remain eligible for interstate movement of their animals.


Whether you prefer hunting deer in a free-range situation or private conservation ranches, deer and elk farming contributes an estimated $4 billion to the U.S. economy. It shouldn’t be regulated to death by a state bureaucracy.


Charly Seale

American Cervid Alliance


Ayr, Neb.


*


http://www.indystar.com/story/opinio...ease/13372105/


*


*


*


24pxYour Opinion: Farmed Deer Should be Classified as Livestock


*


August 13, 2014



NewsTribune.com

Missouri's Capital City News


Charly Seale, Media Review Committee Chair, Ayr, Nebraska


Wednesday, August 13, 2014


Brandon Butler takes aim at deer farmers in his recent column supporting Gov. Nixon’s veto of two bills that would have shifted regulatory oversight of deer farms from the Missouri Department of Conservation to the state Department of Agriculture. Why is Butler opposed to the switch? Deer are obviously wildlife, he says.


Most deer in Missouri are wildlife because they are free-ranging. But when you have deer in a private facility that’s fenced in and the deer are harvested for velvet and meat, or hunted in a private ranch, then the situation changes. These deer are not free-ranging animals, but more like livestock.


That’s the basic difference. But there’s more backstory.


Recently, MDC has proposed draconian regulations for deer farming. The reason given for this is that MDC wants to mitigate the risk on chronic wasting disease spreading in Missouri.


The risk of the spread of CWD is already low due to federal regulations administered by the USDA. Before a facility can transport deer between states, it must be from a CWD-certified herd which is achieved by having every eligible mortality tested for CWD for a minimum of five years. Herd owners must individually identify animals, have fencing in place and conduct regular inventories.


Further, MDC talks out of both sides of its mouth on wildlife disease. MDC over the last few years continues to import elk from Kentucky that originated from CWD-positive states for a relocation project in a manner that does not comply with federal CWD entry requirements administered by the USDA. The elk that were imported were not from CWD-certified herds, which is the requirement for private farms — a requirement MDC is now trying to ignore with its proposed blanket ban on deer imports.


MDC’s agenda is really to put deer farms out of business — and this isn’t supported by the hunting community. A recent Outdoor Life poll of over 3,000 respondents found that 62 percent believe that deer farms are a legitimate business. Only 17 percent thought they should be banned.


MDC cannot be impartial in its oversight of deer farms. Many states already recognize that deer farms should be regulated by agriculture departments and not wildlife departments, and others are considering similar moves. Missouri would be wise to follow in their steps.


*


*


http://www.newstribune.com/news/2014...assified-live/
Travis is offline  
Old May 18th 2021, 12:57 AM   #2
 
  May 2021
  Canada
Where I used to read at Centennial Park discount cabinets waco
yeoyeo is offline  
Reply

  Deer Farmer > Deer Farming Forum > Cervid Industry

Tags
indystar, missouri, positive



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Missouri Deer Farmers Serve Lawsuit to Missouri Department of Conservation and Commissioners Travis Cervid Industry 2 May 18th 2021 12:48 AM
A positive article, needing feedback Show Me Racks Cervid Industry 12 Apr 10th 2014 12:23 PM
Deer From Eastern PA Positive for CWD Padencreek Cervid Industry 1 Apr 10th 2014 04:04 AM
What to expect from what I hope is a false positive TB test BJ WESTFALL Cervid Industry 26 Jun 10th 2013 10:50 AM
Need Help... Positive Outlook of Hunting Preserves T.R.O. Cervid Community 3 Feb 15th 2011 03:29 PM


Facebook Twitter Google+ RSS Feed