Deer Farmer

Go Back   Deer Farmer > Deer Farming Forum > Cervid Industry

Cervid Industry Cervid Industry Forum - share, discuss, and debate important issues and matters within the cervid industry


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes

Old Dec 4th 2013, 10:55 AM   #1
 
  Nov 2012
  Garnett, Kansas


From the American Cervid Alliance News Room


12-4-2013


*


UPDATE- New CWD Federal Standards Version 23 to Head to Public Comment


ACA Plans to Highlight Changes and Organize Comment Effort


AYR,NE- The CWD Standards Working Group convened Wednesday, December 4, at the request of USDA’s Deputy Director, Dr. John Clifford.* Dr. Clifford, who agreed to give a personal review of the CWD Standards document, told the group he has reviewed the document and made several changes.* The new document, to be known in the industry as Version 23, will be published for public comment most likely within a month.

*

The stakeholders of the Working Group, which includes representatives from the cervid industry, APHIS, wildlife agencies, NVSL, and state health officials, asked general questions about procedures and language contained within the document.* Dr Clifford answered specific questions asked by the group but stated he will not provide the working group with a copy of the new document.


*


It appears many of the concerns expressed by industry have been addressed in the new version, but several unresolved issues still remain. Once industry leaders receive a copy of the new document, a formal outline will be prepared and distributed to ACA leaders and industry.


Dr. Clifford stated that 60 month quarantine on an infected or exposed herd is not negotiable because that is rule language and to change that would require opening the rule; however, states may use an epidemiological investigation to determine the time frame for trace backs and trace-forwards.* There are circumstances that may warrant less than a five year trace-back or trace-forward.* This was a major issue that industry worked hard to accomplish and was reflected in version 18 of the Program Standards which was prepared by state health officials and industry.


*


Travis Lowe, representing the North American Elk Breeders Association, told the CWD working group that the American Cervid Alliance plans to work with its thirty-two member associations and organize a robust display of public comments from the industry, highlighting both the positive and negative language in the document.* This will be a major topic of discussion during the next ACA Council meeting next week.


*


The cervid industry representatives on the CWD Working Group are Eric Mohlman, Charly Seale, and Shawn Schafer.*
Travis is offline  
Old Dec 5th 2013, 05:13 AM   #2
 
  Sep 2012
  Clear Lake, Iowa
Time to open the rule for changes. We couldn't be better prepared than we are now with our USAHA Subcommittee. If we request to open it will it be addressed next year at USAHA? Or does it take three years to accomplish changes to Federal Rules?
Rhonda Brakke is offline  
Old Dec 5th 2013, 10:00 AM   #3
 
  Nov 2012
  Garnett, Kansas


Rhonda, I agree that our new USAHA committee is huge for our industry. I have heard several state vets say this was a big step for our industry. As our associations work together I think we need to take a hard look at our CWD policy, both at the state and federal level, and ask ourselves what is our goal and desired direction with the standards and the rule.


*


During yesterday's conference call with the USDA, we were glad to see several items from our 'dealbreaker list' be addressed, but there are still several left that are still in the document. And these items, such as top soil requirements and recommendation of double fencing, is still in there and not part of the rule. We need to be prepared for a vibrant and professional display of comments from the industry.


*


Our industry is under fire from over-regulation and negative propaganda. * We need to start asking ourselves what should approach should we be taking to protect our livelihoods and what is our goal.* We are negotiating for our lives here.* For our businesses. I think everyone needs to be reaching out to their local association leaders and asserting their wishes because I personally want to know how yall feel when your ACA councilman speaks on your behalf.


There is too much at stake to fade quietly in the night.
Travis is offline  
Old Dec 5th 2013, 11:46 AM   #4
 Four Seasons Whitetails's Avatar
 
  Oct 2009
  upstate ny

Cervid: Whitetail Deer


For some its a bit to late i guess. When states can..AND WILL..make their own rules reguardless of and standards or rules its a lopsided battle. Lets just hope that the majority of states use their heads and deal with what the picture shows and then maybe some states that hid under the blanket and just pulled the plug may take a second look!
Four Seasons Whitetails is offline  
Reply

  Deer Farmer > Deer Farming Forum > Cervid Industry

Tags
comment, cwd, federal, head, public, standards, update, version



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ACA Council Approves Alternative Program Standards Document for Public Comment Travis Cervid Industry 0 Mar 25th 2014 10:51 AM
Review: Version 23 of Chronic Wasting Disease Program Standards “Better than Version 22, but still Burdensome to Industry” Travis Cervid Industry 38 Jan 16th 2014 12:32 PM
CWD Standards Version 23 now Open for Public Comment Travis Cervid Industry 1 Dec 31st 2013 01:08 PM
USDA Officials: CWD Standards Going to Public Comment Soon Travis Cervid Industry 0 Sep 20th 2013 10:35 AM
Federal CWD Standards Draft- Version 22 Travis Cervid Industry 0 Jun 26th 2013 07:22 AM


Facebook Twitter Google+ RSS Feed