"Spiderweb" CWD Quarantines Continue for Whitetail Farmers

Deer Farmer Forum

Help Support Deer Farmer Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Nov 13, 2012
Messages
183
Location
Garnett, Kansas
16pt 12pxFrom the American Cervid Alliance Newsroom
 
"Spiderweb" CWD Quarantines Continue for Whitetail Farmers

 
Possible Protocol Relief in Future

 


AYR, NE- The number of quarantined deer farms has grown since this summer due to Chronic Wasting Disease being discovered on additional farms.  Dozens of deer farms in Pennsylvania, Ohio and other eastern states have been impacted by trace-back policy derived from the Federal Program Standards and not the Federal CWD rule.  Some states are using an automatic 60 month quarantine instead of an epidemiological investigation to determine the degree of exposure of trace-back and trace-forward herds.  If a deer farm finds CWD, states can examine any farm they have done business within the previous sixty months and implement whole herd quarantines on those connected farms.  This has caused a major disruption for farms in this region, especially at a time when they usually move breeding and trophy animals.  The new trace-out policy practiced by some of these states, in using the USDA's CWD Program Standards document, is not based on current science and in essence is a "scorched earth policy" approach. 


The USDA's Federal Rule addresses this issue and calls for epidemiological investigations for these cases.  The Program Standards document, which accompanies the federal rule as optional additional guidelines, adds more stringent protocol.  The program standards document dedicates over a dozen additional pages to these situations, which has been adopted by several state agencies word for word.  American Cervid Alliance Moderator Eric Mohlman said this course of action was foreseen by many cervid leaders.  "We fought hard to draw a hard line on the standards in our Standards Working Group last year because we knew some states would adopt these optional guidelines verbatim."


Other cervid leaders say the standards policy goes above and beyond the intent of the federal rule.   Charly Seale, an ACA Councilman representing the Exotic Wildlife Association, said, "we (the ACA) knew this would happen and we warned the industry months ago. The federal rule has been adopted with control and a minimization of risk of the spread of CWD in mind. The program standards, on the other hand, are designed for eradication of the disease, which science has shown is impossible. Everyone in this industry should have seen this coming."


The American Cervid Alliance opened the discussion of amending the standards trace-forward and trace-back language from 60 months to 36 months in the USAHA Farmed Cervid Subcommittee at the 2014 conference. The negotiations for changing the Program Standards are ongoing and hopefully will provide reasonable change in the future.  In addition, at the 2014 USDA Cervid Sector meeting in Washington DC, cervid leaders in attendance asked USDA's leadership to help relieve unnecessary quarantines. 


"We have to do something," added Seale.  "The CWD Federal Rule does provide the industry some protection in showing the farmed cervid critics we have a responsible program. The program standards, however, go above and beyond the rule and regulatory agencies that are adopting these as their state's policy are punishing the farmed cervid industry within that state."


The American Cervid Alliance will keep the farmed cervid industry up to date any changes as they occur.
 
It truly is a shame the our industry is discriminated against in this manner. I think the overarching issue is clearly stated above though, we as an industry were sold these standards as something that was beneficial to us (a must have to continue to do business). Clearly it is not. Thanks to all at the ACA who put their time and effort into these issues. It does not go unnoticed.
 
EVERYTHING that happened in Iowa was based on the Standards, as recorded in court. We go to district court on Friday.
 
josh , for those of us on the ACA meetings we all discussed and knew it  wasn't good and yet was supported by NADEFA.
 
On what standards are states like Pensilvania and Ohio administering quarantine protocols.

Are they simply following the Federal Rule and ignoring the Program Standards document? Isn't the purpose of a quarantine to reduce exposure risk? How can a farm have a single quarantined animal co-mingling with the entire herd and then be allowed to sell any animal from the rest of the herd to other accredited herds? This seems like a pile of organized confusion to me that is potentially putting unsuspecting farmers herd accreditations at risk.
 
Bell1001371418667075



On what standards are states like Pensilvania and Ohio administering quarantine protocols.

Are they simply following the Federal Rule and ignoring the Program Standards document? Isn't the purpose of a quarantine to reduce exposure risk? How can a farm have a single quarantined animal co-mingling with the entire herd and then be allowed to sell any animal from the rest of the herd to other accredited herds? This seems like a pile of organized confusion to me that is potentially putting unsuspecting farmers herd accreditations at risk.




Have to agree that it seems to be playing into the hands of some. Strange thing is...is that it sounds like some farms are ok with it...
 
And how can they be allowed to put animals in a sale is beyond me. This is the exact accountability we have discussed in another thread. This and other reasons are why this industry is flailing at the moment. It creates dissention among farmers which is exactly what people outside this industry want. They know some will be okay with it, that's the wedge.

Are all the farms disclosing the fact they have an animal on quarantine??? I bet not, because nobody in their right mind would buy off them if they did!!!
 
This needs discussion so that the naive and uninformed are educated. I don't understand half of it but I have a feeling that somewhere Patty and her coalition are chuckling.
 
Jonathan,

This has to be coming from the Pa ag department. Do you think Indiana board of health would be allowing this? I hope nobody on the pa board supports this!! In no way is this good for the industry as it stands. I have no problem with them moving to a terminal market, but for other farmers to be able to purchase with the standards as they stand today is plain wrong.
 
What if an animal from a herd that has a single quarantined animal goes to a terminal facility like a preserve but isn't harvested for 3 years. Then consider what would happen if I also sold several of our hunt bucks to the same preserve and one of them also isn't harvested for 2 or 3 years. Next, if both of these bucks 3 years later test positive when harvested is my farm now quarantined even though I shipped a healthy animal to the preserve? Do I even want to risk the exposure I may be subjected too if I sell hunt bucks to a preserve that buys animals out of states that are following this quarantine protocol?

If protocol relief is administered this way in every state, I guess this might not be a big deal. Indiana's BOAH likely will not sing out of this song book. I hope someone can explain this protocol relief better. I would like to understand it more thoroughly. Is this even what is being described as protocol relief in the host posted topic? I hope this discussion helps people to further understand how disastrous the current program standards document is to our industry.
 
jerrilee cave1001421418668779



Was this information disclosed at the chupp sale for the farm/farms on quarantine in PA?




What farms that are on quarantine, also had lots in that sale?  I was unaware of any.
 
The state publishes the current list of quarantined farms. Comparing it to the list of consigners in the sale catalogue may answer your question.
 
I did, I'm unaware of any.  I did notice one but the deer were on another farm in Ohio.
 
If you go back to the Standards Program,  you will see that a quarantine for the entire herd is called for, on a trace-back.   BUT,  the problem we are having is, some of the states are doing trace-backs on trace-back herds.  This is probably why you are seeing individual animal quarantines.  They are going over and above the Federal Rule on this.  This is what happened at Flees.  The Flees herd WAS the trace-back herd.  All animals quarantined from Flees on other farms were trace-backs from a trace-back herd.  AGAIN, over and above the Federal Rule. If you dig a little on these single animal quarantines, I'll bet that is what you are seeing.  I will guarantee these states are not doing the minimum.
 
Kinda Ironic that if you buy an animal that has not been thru a TB/Bruc test and you want it Accredited that Animal has to be kept separate from ALL other animals and CAN NOT share a common fence??


TB/Bruc has been proven that it kills Animals???? But CWD has been MORE Proven...er ???? LMAO  :D


 


The Dip $hits that RUN the WORLD...................WHO wouldn't want a pup outta that litter?? SMH <_<
 
jerrilee cave1001521418689846



Gary that is a trace back to flees and a trace forward from flees isn't it? Not 2 trace backs




 


correct.  It is still trace on trace.
 

Recent Discussions

Back
Top