At our state cervid meeting with the BAH, the big game director is asking to introduce a law, to get 100% compensation for DNR for any and all expenses in capturing or killing an escaped cervid. He admitted that ALL their salary money comes from tag and license sales, and this was taking to much time out of their days. WOW, so the more they sell, the more they have in the budget for salaries, raises, and pensions ???
Here is a quote from an article :::
While allowing shooting on game preserves wouldn't in itself spread disease or contaminate herd genetics, DNR officials fear the very thing that ranchers desire -- that legal shooting would increase demand for animals and boost the number of game farms. Then problems would worsen proportionately.
Undercut Public Hunting
Then there's the concern that if captive hunts catch on, the whole industry would undercut public hunting and the system of wildlife management as they have evolved in this country during the past century.
So is that the bottom line?? These people are worried about their jobs?? We will hurt license sales[salaries]??
Another quote::
Valerius Geist agrees. Geist, professor emeritus of environmental science and adjunct professor of biology at the University of Calgary and a world-renowned expert on hoofed game, admitted he once fell for game ranching "hook, line, and sinker." "Now I am ashamed to reflect that it took me all of eight years to see through the consequences, for on the surface it all looks so innocent and appealing," he later wrote.
The trouble, he says, is that game ranching undercuts the enviable system of game management that evolved in North America during the 20th century. Game ranching violates all the primary tenets of that system -- that wildlife belongs to the public, that it is not for sale, that even the poor can hunt, and that wildlife is killed only out of necessity. "It's not there to be blasted for the hell of it and to be left here to die," Geist says. "We don't shoot it for fun; we shoot it for utility."
"Hunting is a relationship with the land and the animal you're hunting, and this isn't hunting," says LaFleur of the Izaak Walton League. Rather than nurture that relationship, he says, the acceptance of private hunting will erode the commitment to maintaining a system of public hunting areas. "The commercialization of hunting will become the norm," LaFleur says. "I think it will weaken our system of wildlife management areas. It's not going to topple the wildlife management system in a week or a day. But it is just another erosion of it."
WOW, they kill for necessity, we don't shoot it for fun????? Even the poor can hunt? Everyone knows it is cheaper to go the store and buy food, than to hunt it. Who are these people??
Their concerns of wildlife needs to be owned by the public?? Do you know what they are promoting?? I took these terms out of Wikipedia.
Socialism (Lower-stage communism)
The socialist mode of production is the post-capitalist economic system that emerges when the accumulation of capital is no longer sustainable due to falling rates of profit in (real) production, and social conflict arising from the contradictions between the level of technology and automation in the economy with the capitalist form of social organization. A socialist society would consist of production being carried out, organized in a manner to directly satisfy human needs, with the working-class cooperatively or publicly owning the means of production.
Communism (Upper-stage communism)
The ideal of communism did and does refer to a hypothetical future state of affairs where the good of all is obtained by scientific management (whence the name "scientific socialism") to obtain democratically determined social goals. Karl Marx made a distinction between "lower stage communism" and "upper-stage communism", with the former usually being called socialism.
"The good of the all" is communism. Where a free society[democracy], protects and individuals freedoms and rights.
Does anyone else see anything wrong here???? Where are they taking this country???? Brakkes case is a perfect example of government overreach. They have to spend 100's of thousands of dollars, just to protect their rights, then have some bureaucrats, retaliate against them with an audit??? Why do you think this same government wants to take our guns away??
Gary