Oh guys, don't get me started...wait, you already have, ie ''Illinois' late season doe hunt''
I've been an outfitter(free range) in Illinois for 23 years. In the course of that 23 years Illinois has received millions and millions of dollars from non resident hunters, due to one thing and one thing ONLY...the whitetail buck that resides within her boundaries! And yet they fall WAY SHORT of doing anything to significantly protect the resource that is soley responsible for ushering in all this money. In fact, they are doing things that actually impede the protection thereof of our unique and incredibly valueable resource.
ILLINOIS - Are you ignorant...or just plain stupid...or, are your pockets getting padded somehow or other by the insurance companies that the protection of these other monies don't matter.
I'm in total agreement with sdbigbucks and have never agreed or adhered to the mind set that we need to kill off our does in order to have bigger and better bucks, not here in the midwest anyway where food is more than adequate!
BUT...if Illinois is determined, by whatever influence, be it ignorance, stupidity, insurance companies, or a combination of all three, then how about this?.........
Let's have our doe season in early October. This accomplishes 4 very important things:
1) Less button bucks will be shot because the longer winter hair is not yet present, hence making the ''buttons'' more distinguishable without the longer hair to cover them up.
2) NO CHANCE of a buck being shot as a doe because of an early shedding of his antlers.
3) The bucks will not have wasted their energies chasing and breeding these does for nothing, as in the case when these does are shot late winter.
4) And last but certainly not least, there will be more kids involved in the hunt if it's early and not late, hence escaping the normal harsh weather conditions of winter. If we don't get our youth started, we sooner than you think won't have to worry about our seasons...the late ones or the early ones!
Another thing Illinois needs to incorporate is an antler restriction of some kind. So many hunters that shoot the forkeys and the little yearling sixes amd eights will tell you they dont care about the horns, that they just want the meat. I say, then shoot a doe, and in order to protect the resource so should the State say that, and so should the insurance company. You say''Why the insurance company?'' When someone shoots a doe, at any time of the year, early, late, or somewhere inbetween, they are actually killing/taking 3 deer out of the woods and/or off the roadside.
So...forcing that meat hunter to shoot a doe instead of that little buck satifiies everyone's interests!
I just recently finished up a hunt with some clients over this last weekend. I'm in Joe Daviess County, which becasue CWD was discovered within it's boundaries last year, we are allowed to shoot bucks with unfilled gun tags during our 2 late season doe hunts.
We shot 15 deer: 1 nice buck(I'm happy to report with antlers), 7 does(one of which I happen to check when gutting, she had twin bucks inside her), 6 button bucks, and 1 buck that was already shed out that was AT LEAST 3 years old according to his body, his feet(hoof wear), and his silver dollar sized pedicles. To sum up our hunt - Nearly half of our deer killed were to a signicantly measure ''wasted''.
I've already written a letter to the State expressing the above, and I encourage all of you to do the same. Maybe it is more of a lack of knowledge(ignorance), of which we can fix.
But if the problem with the State is more of the ''pocket padding'' nature of a certain few, or of it's stupidity, then unfotunately, it's hard to fix either of those...greed or stupidity!
Bruns Island - Good for you in writing that letter, and I agree, we ALL should have jumped on this with both feet along time ago!!!
Thanking God often that there is more to life than deer...there really is guys!