Please find attached background information on Senate bill 225 and Housebill 410.
This legislation threatens to transfer jurisdictional
authority for deer propagators and hunting preserves from the Division
of Wildlife to the Ohio Department of Agriculture. It is scheduled for
sponsor testimony in the Senate on Weds. Jan.27th. Please have
interested members contact their senators in opposition to the bill,
particularly contacts to Senators on the Senate Agriculture Committee (
see link below )
Thank you,
Jim Marshall
Asst. Chief
HB 410 SB 225: Talking Points
January 21, 2010
Legislation at issue: HB 410 and SB 225 which propose to transfer regulatory authority over cervid propagation and hunting preserve facilities from the Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife to the Department of Agriculture.
Background: The Division of Wildlife holds in trust the ownership of all wild animals in the state for the benefit of all the people. ORC requires the Division to enforce the laws and rules providing for the protection, preservation, propagation and management of wild animals. The Division of Wildlife has in place an effective law enforcement unit that consists of 137 officers located throughout the state in all 88 counties that inspect propagation and hunting preserve facilities and enforce rules associated with captive deer. There are currently more than 700 propagators in Ohio and between 25 and 30 deer hunting preserves. There are documented cases of CWD-infected captive deer which raises fear that it could be transmitted to wild deer.
CWD, which causes a fatal degeneration of the brain in white-tailed deer and other cervids, poses a severe biological threat to Ohio’s deer population. There are also grave sociological and economic threats to the state’s citizens should the disease come to Ohio. Without the ability to enforce rules pertaining to captive white-tailed deer, the Division’s ability to protect wild populations of these animals from disease is severely impacted. Maintaining healthy wildlife populations is the most basic function of the Division of Wildlife. The Division’s business-friendly regulations and consistent enforcement of regulations protects both the wild herd and the state’s captive deer industry.
Enforcement and Surveillance
Numerous cases of non-CWD certified deer being moved to and from Ohio have been documented, as have cases of propagators taking or obtaining deer from the wild. Since July 1, 2007 wildlife officers have conducted 395 inspections of deer holding facilities. Forty-one issues or problems were documented and 16 charges were filed. Current cases involve cooperation with other states and with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Charges include conspiracy, violations of the Lacey Act and interstate transportation of non-CWD certified deer. In a Highland County case, our officers discovered illegal importation of deer from a CWD infected area resulting in a joint-agency decision to eradicate the herd. In another current case a propagator was convicted of 14 felony counts. The Division of Wildlife, with its significant numbers of well-trained law enforcement officers is uniquely suited to dealing with laws and rules dealing with captive cervids.
The Division of Wildlife, in conjunction with the Ohio Department of Agriculture's (ODA) Division of Animal Industry and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services and Wildlife Services, has been conducting surveillance throughout the state for Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD), as well as epizootic hemorrhagic disease and bovine tuberculosis since 2002 (TB testing was initiated in 1996). The Division’s surveillance effort is based upon potential disease exposure risk. This effort is intended to aggressively monitor the wild herd for CWD with a focus on those animals that are most likely to contract the disease.
Economic Issues
• Ohio’s deer management program is one of the most envied in the country. The state ranks 8th nationally for the number of resident hunters. It also ranks 8th nationally in annual hunting-related sales and 10th in the number of jobs associated with the hunting-related industry. Each year, hunting has an $859 million economic impact in Ohio through the sale of equipment, fuel, food, lodging, etc. (USFWS 2006 National Survey of Hunting and Wildlife Associated Recreation and Southwick Associates and Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Hunting in America: An Economic Engine and Conservation Powerhouse)
• The Division of Wildlife was honored with the Quality Deer Management Association (QDMA) 2009 Agency of the Year Award. QDMA annually recognizes a state wildlife agency for its dedication to the quality deer management philosophy and the positive results it has yielded.
• Nationally, Ohio has become known as a major deer hunting state with several world record animals having been taken in recent years. Non-resident hunting license sales have increased by 55% over the last five years.
• CWD was detected in the state of Wisconsin in 2002; resident hunter numbers dropped by 10% and non-resident numbers dropped by 19%. Financial loss associated with losing those hunters was estimated at about $20 million. In addition, WI spent $12.6 million combating CWD in 2003 and has spent $5 million annually since.
Potentially Impacted Interests
• Disease in Ohio’s wild deer population would negatively impact participation by the state’s 415,736 licensed resident hunters and the 35,115 licensed non-resident hunters who travel here.
• A thriving venison donation program that provided about 400,000 meals to needy families throughout the state in 2009
• The 3,357,000 Ohioans who list wildlife watching as their outdoor-related activity
Small Businesses that would be negatively impacted
• The 338+ taxidermists who support Ohio’s deer hunting industry
• The state’s 250 - 350 deer processors.
• Hotels/motels
• Campgrounds
• Restaurants
• Sporting goods stores
• Gas stations/fuel retailers
• Hunting license agents
Conclusion
The Division of Wildlife has successfully regulated the hunting preserves and propagators since 1953 and deer propagators since 1994. It is in the process of implementing additional rules that reinforce the protection of the state’s wild deer herd. While the Division cannot prevent diseases introduced through natural movement or migration of deer, it can implement and enforce regulations as a preventative measure to minimize the risk from the spread of disease through the intrastate movement of live captive wildlife or hunter-harvested wildlife.
The ability of escaped or released captive deer to bring disease to the wild herd is a major concern on many levels, including economic. There is no method to distinguish an escaped captive deer from a free-ranging wild deer. CWD has been detected in nearby states of Michigan, Illinois, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and New York as well as 8 other states. Under the Division of Wildlife’s regulatory diligence Ohio stands out for the disease not having being been detected here.
Bullet Points for HB 410 & SB 225
1. A bill has been introduced that would transfer regulatory authority of captive cervids (white-tailed and other deer) from the ODNR Division of Wildlife (DOW) to the Ohio Department of Agriculture. (House Bill 410 and Senate Bill 225)
2. Hunting contributes $859 million to Ohio’s economy each year. A diseased wild deer herd would drastically reduce this major revenue generator.
3. There are documented cases of CWD-infected captive deer that raise fear that it could be transmitted to wild deer.
4. One major disease, Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) has been detected and has negatively impacted the deer herds in five nearby states and eight other states throughout the country. CWD has NOT been detected in Ohio.
5. DOW has 137 Wildlife Officers across the state that inspect propagation and hunting preserve facilities.
6. DOW has an extensive, well-trained staff of biologists who are devoted to the health and management of Ohio’s wild deer herd.
7. The Division of Wildlife has successfully regulated hunting preserves and game propagators since 1953.
8. Many small businesses in Ohio, including hundreds of taxidermists, meat processors, sporting goods retailers, restaurants and motels directly benefit from the Division’s successful management of a healthy, abundant and well-distributed wild deer herd.
9. Ohio is nationally recognized for its successful deer management program.
10. The Division of Wildlife has drafted additional rules for protecting Ohio’s wild deer herd and their implementation will include common sense monitoring of diseases within captive deer facilities in Ohio.
It is critical for the Division of Wildlife to maintain its regulation and authority over captive cervids as a tool to protect Ohio’s wild deer herd.