I have wandered this myself. My wife tells me I am CRAZY, but I still don't think just the male decides the *** of the fawn. I have a 7 year old doe from J-44 genetics. She bred as an 8 month old fawn, and gave us a single buck fawn. In the past 6 years, she has given us twins every year. We have bred her with three different bucks during those 6 years. Of those 12 fawns, only 1 has been a buck. Odds are that it would be 50% bucks...but only 8% being bucks is really hard for me to understand.
Coincidentally, this doe comes from a doe that in 6 years of breeding, with 2 different bucks, only ever gave 2 doe fawns out of 12 total fawns. They were twin does from her first breeding. (Whick I kept the one that we are discussing) She then gave us twin bucks 5 years in a row. The thing that makes this even stranger, is that two years in a row, both mother and daughter were bred to the same buck. Both does gave the normal fawns, twin bucks from the mother and twin does from the daughter.
I am not totally convinced that the father is the only deciding factor on the *** of the fawns.
My one explananation is that some does may contain a chemical in their uterus that is counterproductive to certain sperm cells. Working almost like a spermicide, but chemically deactivating either male or female sperm cells and allowing the other to remain to reach reproduction. If this can be possible, this removes the fact that the father chooses the *** of the fawn. It is the sperm that does decide, but the doe does have an influence.
Does anyone out here have enough scientific backing to confirm or deny my theory?