Just my opinion but I think it more in 3 categories:
Non-Typical: lots of odd inches here, there and everywhere
Typical: a deer with clear-defined typical frame with outriggers, stickers, split brows, and maybe a split G2 or so
Net Typical ("pure" typical): a deer that goes into the score books as a "typical" and qualifies to be scored on a typical score sheet whether B&C, SCI, etc. You may hear once in a while "Slick Typical"... one that has zero non-typical inches.
Here's my example of a "TYPICAL" This guy has a super clean frame other than those brows. His extra inches on his brows are probably just enough to put him on a score sheet as a non-typical but how could you not classify this buck as a "TYPICAL" but clearly not a "NET TYPICAL".
Just look at the what is on the "TYPICAL ANTLERS 2012" thread...look how many of those bucks posted are not technically "true" typicals with less than 3% of trash/extras... on a 200" deer, we are talking less than 6 inches is allowed. I still think of MoneyMaker, DoubleWide, Excalibur, Hardcore Flame, etc. as "typicals" but each one of those bucks has more than 3% of extras, technically making them non-typicals. But I will go out on a tiny limb and say, I still would call these bucks "typicals".