Joined Apr 2009
1,130 Posts | 0+
Columbia, MO
Just wanted to let everyone know to be careful when dealing with any reporter that says he wants to do a story on deer. I have had many calls in the last week and today got a call from a reporter named Joe Drape from the New York Times. He wanted to do a story on our industry and wanted to come to the farm. I did 2 things. First I googled his name and saw he was involved in some PETA activities with the horse industry. Second I forwarded his email to our association attorney. He got back rather promptly and recommended that I don't talk to him or let him on the property.
I think we need to be extremely careful on who we give access to our farms these days. We need positive information but we need to make sure it is put out by people with our best interests in mind.
Here is what I emailed back to him:
Joe, with deep respect I'm going to have to pass on this tour and interview. Our industry has seen too many negative articles from the press. It just seems they get more attention than any positive article. The Indy Star article was just one example of a reporter that was welcomed to people's farms and then turns around and writes an article full of 1/2 truths, one sided observations and some blatant lies. The article much like most articles tries to paint a broad picture of our industry based on the actions of a few people. We believe the reporter was paid by a group of anti-hunters or maybe even the HSUS. The article never mentioned the family hunts, the wounded veteran hunts, or the Safari wish hunts for terminally ill children. It never mentioned how some of the larger ranches like the ones in Missouri have some of the best and most exciting whitetail hunting anywhere. It didn't mention how well we take care of all our animals and how good they have it. It didn't mention how much we test our animals compared to the free ranging herd.
I forwarded your email to my attorney and he recommended me not doing the story. He said it is impossible to know your motives. So unless you can convince me otherwise, I am going to pass. Thanks for thinking of me and I wish you luck in the future.
Sam James
I think we need to be extremely careful on who we give access to our farms these days. We need positive information but we need to make sure it is put out by people with our best interests in mind.
Here is what I emailed back to him:
Joe, with deep respect I'm going to have to pass on this tour and interview. Our industry has seen too many negative articles from the press. It just seems they get more attention than any positive article. The Indy Star article was just one example of a reporter that was welcomed to people's farms and then turns around and writes an article full of 1/2 truths, one sided observations and some blatant lies. The article much like most articles tries to paint a broad picture of our industry based on the actions of a few people. We believe the reporter was paid by a group of anti-hunters or maybe even the HSUS. The article never mentioned the family hunts, the wounded veteran hunts, or the Safari wish hunts for terminally ill children. It never mentioned how some of the larger ranches like the ones in Missouri have some of the best and most exciting whitetail hunting anywhere. It didn't mention how well we take care of all our animals and how good they have it. It didn't mention how much we test our animals compared to the free ranging herd.
I forwarded your email to my attorney and he recommended me not doing the story. He said it is impossible to know your motives. So unless you can convince me otherwise, I am going to pass. Thanks for thinking of me and I wish you luck in the future.
Sam James