This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Beware of Reporters

Joined Apr 2009
1,130 Posts | 0+
Columbia, MO
Just wanted to let everyone know to be careful when dealing with any reporter that says he wants to do a story on deer. I have had many calls in the last week and today got a call from a reporter named Joe Drape from the New York Times. He wanted to do a story on our industry and wanted to come to the farm. I did 2 things. First I googled his name and saw he was involved in some PETA activities with the horse industry. Second I forwarded his email to our association attorney. He got back rather promptly and recommended that I don't talk to him or let him on the property.


 


I think we need to be extremely careful on who we give access to our farms these days. We need positive information but we need to make sure it is put out by people with our best interests in mind.


 


Here is what I emailed back to him:


 
Joe, with deep respect I'm going to have to pass on this tour and interview. Our industry has seen too many negative articles from the press. It just seems they get more attention than any positive article. The Indy Star article was just one example of a reporter that was welcomed to people's farms and then turns around and writes an article full of 1/2 truths, one sided observations and some blatant lies. The article much like most articles tries to paint a broad picture of our industry based on the actions of a few people. We believe the reporter was paid by a group of anti-hunters or maybe even the HSUS. The article never mentioned the family hunts, the wounded veteran hunts, or the Safari wish hunts for terminally ill children. It never mentioned how some of the larger ranches like the ones in Missouri have some of the best and most exciting whitetail hunting anywhere. It didn't mention how well we take care of all our animals and how good they have it. It didn't mention how much we test our animals compared to the free ranging herd.
 
I forwarded your email to my attorney and he recommended me not doing the story. He said it is impossible to know your motives. So unless you can convince me otherwise, I am going to pass. Thanks for thinking of me and I wish you luck in the future.
 
Sam James
 
Ryan Sabolow ruined me to ever talking to ANY reporters. When he was at the farm he nothing but good to say about deer farming and even said we have have the coolest job ever. And wow how he changed
 
To bad you didn't tape record the comments Ryan made.   He would have had lots to explain if they were made public.


Gary
 
I just don't see how Ryan could legally tape video on Coby's farm and then use it to attempt to make them or the purpose of their farm look bad. I thought Indiana had some of the strongest laws in the country prohibiting that.
 
Sam

It worries me this reporter is going to press this issue. He may go to someone less informed or with a weaker mind. You are one of the top people in the industry to defend it.
 
Thumbs up Sam, good job. I have declined several interviews, but Bell is right, they always find someone else to twist their words. No reporters can be trusted.
 
I think IF and only IF a reporter is allowed on any farms there should be another party there to video record the event as a back up to what took place.
 
The thought about him going somewhere else crossed my mind so I asked our attorney about a contract giving us the final approval of the article. He said that's hard to enforce even if they sign it and he thought nobody would. But I did leave the ball in his court to see how he responds. I'll see what he has to offer. You are right in the fact that I'd like to handle it but if it's dirt he is after there is really nothing we can do to prevent it if we let him on our place..
 
Local outdoor writers get much of their bread and butter from state/federal wildlife agencies. Those who disagree with a certain wildlife agency position against game farms will more than likely stand down. And then there is the activist journalist who will happily carry the message. It is darn hard to figure out who is who.

In North Dakota, the reporter who didn't want to get in the middle didn't call. It was the reporter who was against you that wanted to do the story. They couldn't get the story being unfriendly. Their lead line was, "this will be an opportunity to tell your story." We told them, "no thanks, we'll pay for our own ads."

We did a total lock down, no one was to talk to the press. The press called several producers. When they called me I asked who was to be the rebuttal to me or give the oppositions position. They admitted to be fair they would have to allow the opposition to rebutt. This is the part where they make the opposition look very intelligent and then discard 99 great comments made by you only to print the one thing you said in an interview that was a little off the cuff.

Sam James is right. Trial by media. Refuse to play the game.
 
This reporter skipped over several thousand deer farms between New York and where Sam is in Missouri. In North Dakota there aren't many deer farms to reach with the message to "refuse to play the game". There are so many very uniformed and uneducated deer farmers for this reporter to target and set up. There isn't any way to stop all of them from letting this clown interview and set them up at their farms. If the interviews are going to happen regardless, I would rather it be our industries best and brightest who are interviewed on their farms.

I like Rogers idea where the person being interviewed also gets to record or video the interview.
 
We have talked to many reporters in the 20 years we have been in this business.  At best, we had neutral stories.  They will never give you any sort of prior approval before printing.  Sam's answer is a good one.  At least they can't say we didn't return the call etc.
 
When he first called he said he was from the Kansas City Area and wanted to combine the trip with a trip home. I have done numerous phone interviews just to try to salvage some of our side of the story. When they call and ask if I have a minute I ask if they have about 4 hours. Usually they get tired after about an hour. Most of the time they seem to somewhat get it but like Wild Rivers said it never turns out good....just neutral at best. They seem surprised and disappointed when they hear the truth. I get the feeling they have their story and just call so they can say "The President of the Missouri Deer Association couldn't be reached for comment". So I try to take every call. Many reporters don't even try.


 


Since my lawyer has recommended I not let him or anyone else on the farm that's what I'm going to do. I asked him about the guy just finding another farm to interview and he said he probably will. There are not a lot of people who have both a breeding operation and hunting ranches so he may have a little trouble finding that. I hope so. Anyway I'll let you know how he responds.
 
How about the call..That i did not answer and left message..and the email i received a couple weeks ago from some girl saying she wanted to do a story on deer farms for National Geographic? I gave no replies and she never has not retried her request!
 
I ran across an article on the GQ website that I found not only interesting, but laid out the many positive aspects of elephant hunting. Elephant hunting is something that in my opinion is view by many as a "disgusting act". I think the author, Wells Tower may be the type of reporter who could show the positive side of the deer industry. There are so many things that the deer industry provides, maybe the deer industry needs to seek out reporters who are willing and able to show some positive publicity. Below is a link to the GQ article, it is a little long, but I suggest reading it......


 


http://www.gq.com/long-form/who-wants-to-shoot-an-elephant
 
Mike

May 16, Russel posted the topic National Geographic Video. I was trying to tell people beware but some thought it was a cool opportunity. The girl who tried to contact you was likely Jenna.
 
I received a call last week from a reporter in Washington State looking to do a story on captive deer farms, I told her to contact the State DCNR or Dept of Ag. She thanked me and hung up, LOL
 
Johnny B937081403619666



I ran across an article on the GQ website that I found not only interesting, but laid out the many positive aspects of elephant hunting. Elephant hunting is something that in my opinion is view by many as a "disgusting act". I think the author, Wells Tower may be the type of reporter who could show the positive side of the deer industry. There are so many things that the deer industry provides, maybe the deer industry needs to seek out reporters who are willing and able to show some positive publicity. Below is a link to the GQ article, it is a little long, but I suggest reading it......


 


http://www.gq.com/long-form/who-wants-to-shoot-an-elephant




i can't get the link to work.


Gary
 
Bell,


 


I forgot to mention in North Dakota we have all producer's email in an address book. I type one message and it goes immediately to every elk and deer producer. People who are too busy to read their email is a problem. But we got to the right ones and frustrated the media who were trying to keep the issue in front of the people.  


 


Networking.
 
You may have to enable the link on your browsers settings in order to open it. I was able to open the link. 
 
I do agree that we need to be careful who we talk with, but the right reporter will help us out also. Good reporters are out there.  We need some positive press. I did an on farm interview about a year ago and it was great! The story did focus on fawns and it was on three different news programs and outdoor programs. Not a negative comment. The anchor ( Lindsey Hayes ) is a true outdoors person and tries to do her very best to cover the story as I requested. She spent almost three hours with myself and son and my brothers kids and of course the deer. The story got three to seven minutes of air time. Like I said be careful but do not over look someone who is genuine. Just my 2 cents.