James,Had any of the things you mentioned would have happened I would have told you,but it did'not.As far as the vaccine there was little to no difference between the liquid and pellet efficacy.Some of the titer levels were in the 90's with 60 being acceptable and some were not,but most were.It may not be the silver bullet we were looking for,but at least we did something and did not just sit still and we do know more than we did a year ago.I seemed to have stirred up a hornets nest w/ my initial comment, but the credit goes to Dr Cunningham who made this happen.As far as being stronger than the Missouri vaccine I would say no,because studys show that a stronger vaccine has negligible effects on efficacy.Sometimes more is not always better.