calcium carbonate

Deer Farmer Forum

Help Support Deer Farmer Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
We are feeding a very similar mix as well. I think we have been using it for about 3 years and I know it has made a big difference in body size and the horns are doing better also. Our three year olds are 75-100lbs heavier with this mix over our old mix. I also think it is funny how everyone shuts up when you start talking about feed mixes. Heck someone helped me out with a better mix why would I keep it a secret if someone asked.
 
richie0033 said:
I just meant that the enhancer that some use is supposed to shorten the deeds life span. For example a 3 year old would be considered lucky to have. Not trying to start anything just my 2 cents
Click to expand...



I think what you are referring to is milk calcium. Heard that it could possibly shorten the life span also. It is only supposed to work on yearlings and 2 year olds, nothing older than that. I have already seen one farm advertise that they do not use it.
 
IndependenceRanch said:
I'm just asking if there is a good side to the new stuff provided that a balance is kept in line.
Click to expand...



Roger,

Chelated minerals are nothing new and as a matter of fact I bet the 38% dairy pellet you are feeding more than likely already has some chelated trace minerals in it - most high end dairy pellets do, including calf manna.



I will try to give a very loose explanation of chelates. All chelates really are, are basically minerals attached to some sort of acid or protein that is absorbed through the lining of the intestines much easier. The acids or proteins attached (chelated) with the minerals are seen as a readily available energy source, so to speak, thus allowing a faster absorption and utilization of the mineral.





Do a Google search for "chelated livestock minerals". There is a ton of information on the benefits of feeding livestock chelated minerals...





Good luck,

John







.
 
Roger, I'm like you, give them the best nutrition possible but hold back from the enhancements that cause an unnatural reaction in their bodies. You need to remember, there is a price to pay for pushing unnatural growth in any way. Many in this business don't care and are pushing as hard as they can to get inches early. It will all come out on down the line with shorter lifespans and bucks that flaten out their growth once they get to be 3 or 4 years old. There are no secrets in this business and people I talk to are starting to avoid doing business with the people who go to extremes that are harmful to their deer. Remember, a deer is not supposed to reach his potential until he is 4 to 7 years old. How many bucks are we seeing that are topping out by the time they are 3? I know one thing, I sleep very well at night knowing that I am doing the best for my deer that I can.
 
Where do you think these one hit wonders come from - monster young animals that never make it to maturity....hmmmm...

I'm like Roger, KISS is my policy (keep it simple stupid). I'm too dumb to cheat and lie, I have the memory of a 2 year old.

Production is the most important thing to remember when buying semen or breeding stock out of a certain sire
 
I agree with you guy's. my feed mix is about the same as roger's.I have asked many people about thier feed and if they use any additives. you would have thought i asked em what thier sister looked like in her birthday best.:eek:I have asked why alot of deer don't reach old age they seem to die early no real answer just seems to be hush hush. If i have to cheat to get ahead i'll just stay in the back and learn to like the view!!!!!!!
 
stevel said:
Roger, I'm like you, give them the best nutrition possible but hold back from the enhancements that cause an unnatural reaction in their bodies. You need to remember, there is a price to pay for pushing unnatural growth in any way. Many in this business don't care and are pushing as hard as they can to get inches early. It will all come out on down the line with shorter lifespans and bucks that flaten out their growth once they get to be 3 or 4 years old. There are no secrets in this business and people I talk to are starting to avoid doing business with the people who go to extremes that are harmful to their deer. Remember, a deer is not supposed to reach his potential until he is 4 to 7 years old. How many bucks are we seeing that are topping out by the time they are 3? I know one thing, I sleep very well at night knowing that I am doing the best for my deer that I can.
Click to expand...





Very well said Steve.... I agree! It's hard enough to discern genetic potential based on genetics let alone, now a days, having to take into consideration if the explosive growth is from possible drug enhancements.



I can assure everyone that chelated minerals are not in any way shape or form considered unnatural body altering enhancers. Inorganic (metallic) minerals will be chelated during digestion by the animal anyway. All organic pre-chelated minerals do is offer faster utilization and absorption of up to 45% of the mineral, unlike the 5% absorption of its inorganic counterpart.... Instead of dumping larger unused portions of inorganic minerals out the poop-chute of the animal, chelated minerals offer better utilization with less waste..... :D



I would feel pretty confident in betting that most everyone feeding a commercial pellet as a source of protein, in either a whole pellet or rough texture ration, are in fact already feeding some form of chelated trace mineral to their animals...









.
 
Well....thanks? everyone. I should have done a little research before posting. Shane from MaxRax was kind enough to e-mail me. Seriously, no offense taken. I wonder why (and I will ask) my dealer why he not only suggested this, he offered to order me a bag. Or..(this hurts)..I might not be remembering correctly as it's been some time since we talked about this. Er-r-r-, I kud b rong. I can, however, ask a dumber question if y'all would like. What's the difference between top dressing and field dressing? Signed X Real Ol" Scrape. Now....have fun with this one!!! Ol' Scrape.
 
So if I have learned from this discussion, the "milk calcium" that some are using is just a calcium in a chelated form which allows for better absorbtion by the body. Which means you can still use it without ill effects to the animal PROVIDED that the levels being used are still in a balanced state with the other minerals like phospherous.

My understanding is that the amounts being used vary greatly from farm to farm. That no one has determined what amount is the correct. I have heard some use ounces per ton of feed and some use pounds per ton of feed. Why don't someone who understands this stuff come up with some science to show what is the correct amount?



As to the drugs being used. I think it is wrong and I won't do business with someone who is using them. And I have a few suspects.
 
I emailed Scrapeline, before this thred really got started, so to be fair:



Calcium carbonate is just a standard, economical form of calcium. Like John said, there are lots of different calcium sources (chelated and inorganic). Most people, whether you are feeding deer, cattle, dogs, cats, horses or pigs will use calcium carbonate as the primary calcium source. Tums, the heartburn medicine, is calcium carbonate. most feeds will also have dicalcium phosphate or monocalcium phosphate. these are just two different products that have both calcium and phosphorus in them. when we balance feeds, we target a specific amount of phosphorus that we want in the feed, say 0.7%. We do this by adding a phosphorus source (monocal or dical). then we add calcum carbonate to the feed to bring the calcium amount to a desired level, say 1.4%. Now you have a 1.4:0.7 calcium to phosphorus level or said another way 2:1 ratio.



You can use different forms of calcium (chelated or not chelated) in your deer feed, but figuring out how much the deer is going to use (absorb and not waste) from the specific calcium source you are using is the challenge. Some of the calcium in plants is only 30% absorbed by the animal, calcium carbonate can be 70% absorbable. Calcium citrate (chelated) is more absorbable than calcium carbonate. So on and so on... Now to say this about this "milk calcium" product. I (like many others) do not agree with certain giving drugs to increase antler growth, but milk calcium is not going to shorten the lifespan of a deer. it is a source of calcium (elemental form) and phosphorous (phosphate form). Since the calcium is elemental, it is very absorbable (90-95%). Companies have been using milk calcium to put into yogurts for calcium deficient people. It is expensive because it is human grade.



Keep in mind that the body has a way of regulating the absorption of calcium. The amount of calcium (calcium carbonate) to add to your feed will vary depending on the current calcium and phosphorous levels. It also depends on the dry matter intake of the feed by each deer. once the calcium levels in the blood hit a certain concentration determined by the kidneys, the animal starts to absorb less calcium and starts to excrete more in the feces. too much calcium can interfere with absorption of other nutrients like phosphorus and some fatty acids. By giving a deer "too much of a good thing" like ZZ said, is always a concern no matter what you are giving them. too much calcium, phosphorus, or an imbalance of the two can cause bladder stones to form, block urine excretion and severely hurt or kill the deer. A good healthy, balanced feed is always the solution to sucessful deer farming. try to target a 2:1 ca to p ratio and concentrate on using common ingredients like ca carb. chelated calciums are sometimes hard to come by and very expensive. sometimes we hear things that really confuse us or make us think that we could be doing something better. Feeds and feeding 101...keep feeds simple and effective. Good luck to all.
 
Shane (or should I say Professor Horrocks),



Thank you so much for explaining things in Laymans terms. I have been trying to keep up with things but it gets difficult. I am the type of person that has to SEE things to understand it, reading just doesn't sink in my thick skull.



I have heard of guys putting hydrated lime in their feeds. Is this good or bad? What dosages are acceptable?
 
Shane Horrocks said:
Now to say this about this "milk calcium" product. I (like many others) do not agree with certain giving drugs to increase antler growth, but milk calcium is not going to shorten the lifespan of a deer. it is a source of calcium (elemental form) and phosphorous (phosphate form). Since the calcium is elemental, it is very absorbable (90-95%)
Click to expand...



Hello Shane,

I stated that I am against the use of drugs for growing antler.

I however don't see this milk calcium stuff as being drugs based on what I am learning as we go. I think those who are using this milk calcium are just using another form of calcium from what the "norm" has been over the years.

That said I am hearing of some very large variations in the amounts being used. And I have yet to find anyone who knows what is the correct amount so as not to cause the deer health issues, or just feeding extra that is just wasted by excreting it out the backside of the deer. The ones who have been using it for years aren't talking either because it is their secret or they fear being blackballed for using it.

This stuff may be expensive, but if you don't need nearly as much of it in a batch then maybe the cost is no more than the normally used stuff.

How can someone determine the correct amount to use?

What other changes, if any, to a formula would need to be made to use it while staying balanced?

I am a firm believer in a balanced diet.

Maybe this conversation will help those who are using the stuff but are doing it blindly not knowing how much they should really be using.

For me, I need to see some science before I would consider it.
 
I can double the amount of mineral in our pellet ration for $5.00/ ton by adding powered calcium , I would rather have my deer work their kidneys a little extra than have to pull the calcium they need out of their bones.
 
I would love to have a monster yearlings and God Willing I will someday........but that will be by the animal doing it all on their own.........If it is something that will harm the deer i am against using it. Alot of the things some of these farms are using are very unhealthy for our deer.....just as i wouldn't feed my child anything that is harmful to him I won't do it for my deer either........the deer are my responsibility and like I said before....you take care of them...they will take care of you.......this Industry really needs to step up to the plate and look into these types of things......if there are enhancers...and there are as i no what their using......and they are harmfiul to the deer.......this Industry needs to address the issue....just as they are adressing the issue in sports with steriods........yes it will cost money but it is for the best interest of these animals that we love....(well most of us love anyhow)......some look at the deer as just another way to make an extra dollar.....and if that is your interest....your in the wrong business........yeah its hard not to want to try to keep up with these crazy antlers that we are seeing today....but not when you love these animals and you want what is best for them.........to be honest.....alot of these crazy antlers you see today are pretty much to the point of not even looking like a whitetails rack anymore!! I don't want to get anyone mad that has these big animals as if you got them naturally and not by using the growth enhancers then you have nothing to be mad about...........I just hate to see anyone take advantage of an animals life just so they can make a dollar quicker. Respect these great animals the Lord has given us....if you don't......trust me you have a bigger payment coming your way than the one your getting today for cheating and your not going to like it.....the difference is the payment i am talking about is for an eternity!!!
 
Shane Horrocks said:
I emailed Scrapeline, before this thred really got started, so to be fair:



Calcium carbonate is just a standard, economical form of calcium. Like John said, there are lots of different calcium sources (chelated and inorganic). Most people, whether you are feeding deer, cattle, dogs, cats, horses or pigs will use calcium carbonate as the primary calcium source. Tums, the heartburn medicine, is calcium carbonate. most feeds will also have dicalcium phosphate or monocalcium phosphate. these are just two different products that have both calcium and phosphorus in them. when we balance feeds, we target a specific amount of phosphorus that we want in the feed, say 0.7%. We do this by adding a phosphorus source (monocal or dical). then we add calcum carbonate to the feed to bring the calcium amount to a desired level, say 1.4%. Now you have a 1.4:0.7 calcium to phosphorus level or said another way 2:1 ratio.



You can use different forms of calcium (chelated or not chelated) in your deer feed, but figuring out how much the deer is going to use (absorb and not waste) from the specific calcium source you are using is the challenge. Some of the calcium in plants is only 30% absorbed by the animal, calcium carbonate can be 70% absorbable. Calcium citrate (chelated) is more absorbable than calcium carbonate. So on and so on... Now to say this about this "milk calcium" product. I (like many others) do not agree with certain giving drugs to increase antler growth, but milk calcium is not going to shorten the lifespan of a deer. it is a source of calcium (elemental form) and phosphorous (phosphate form). Since the calcium is elemental, it is very absorbable (90-95%). Companies have been using milk calcium to put into yogurts for calcium deficient people. It is expensive because it is human grade.



Keep in mind that the body has a way of regulating the absorption of calcium. The amount of calcium (calcium carbonate) to add to your feed will vary depending on the current calcium and phosphorous levels. It also depends on the dry matter intake of the feed by each deer. once the calcium levels in the blood hit a certain concentration determined by the kidneys, the animal starts to absorb less calcium and starts to excrete more in the feces. too much calcium can interfere with absorption of other nutrients like phosphorus and some fatty acids. By giving a deer "too much of a good thing" like ZZ said, is always a concern no matter what you are giving them. too much calcium, phosphorus, or an imbalance of the two can cause bladder stones to form, block urine excretion and severely hurt or kill the deer. A good healthy, balanced feed is always the solution to sucessful deer farming. try to target a 2:1 ca to p ratio and concentrate on using common ingredients like ca carb. chelated calciums are sometimes hard to come by and very expensive. sometimes we hear things that really confuse us or make us think that we could be doing something better. Feeds and feeding 101...keep feeds simple and effective. Good luck to all.
Click to expand...





Thank you Shane for sharing a very good explanation, and very well said... You explained it so much better than I was struggling to do... :D







.
 
Hello Jack and Roger,



Hydrated Ca is AKA calcium hydroxide or agriculture lime. I do not have experience using this product, or know anyone elso who does use it, so I cannot say if it is ok or safe to use. Just knowing that it is a pretty basic compound, and that it is traditionally used to help reduce bacterial loads in animal pens or increase the pH of the soil, I'm not too sure if I would use it in my deer feed, and I'm not sure how it would affect the rumen.



Roger, I knew where you were going, I may not have been clear in my post. I agree with you and I don't think milk calcium is a drug either. The more we learn, the better we can do for the deer. Its kinda like the whole chelated mineral thing. Back in the day before chelates we had oxides and sufates (oxygen or sulfur bound to a trace mineral) Now we have chelates (amino acids or proteins bound to a trace mineral). I don't ever remember hearing about chelated trace minerals being bad for an animal just because they are expensive and more absorbable. I agree with you that if we can add less of a superior product than add more of a lower quality product, and get the same results then why not? But to answer your question, we do not have any really good (or any at all) scientific evidence on milk calcium for use in deer feeds. Those studies will have to be performed to understand how much the deer is absorbing and how much the deer is wasting. You are probably hearing much variation in the amount used because breeders are trying to find out what they think works best for them. Deer feeds that are initially lower in ca and p levels will perform better when more milk cal is added to them. Feeds that have higher ca and p levels may not need to be supplemented with as much milk cal to make a difference in performance. So much of the performance from the added milk cal may be attributed to generally higher levels of Ca and P in the feed and have little to do with it being a more bioavailable form. If this is true, you could use more calcium carbanate to achieve the same results and save $$. I too, am going to have to see some scientific evidence before I am convinced that this product is providing additional benefits.
 
Now Jack, Professor Horrocks!? That title would obligate me to be a lot more responsible than I already am. Why would I want to do that?!! Haha...
 
Thank you Shane for your unsolicited e-mail and you taking your time to post on this thread. I do use some of your product, which I purchase from Farmer's Co-op, Sulphur Springs, Tx. Your product/salesman is not those that I mention in my initial thread. Bob Taylor, Scrapelineranch.
 

Similar threads

B
Is Deer Farming really profitable
Replies
0
Views
1K
Bcroell
B
P
What to Feed?
Replies
0
Views
1K
PopPop
P
S
What do you think? Fawn Question
Replies
0
Views
582
Standing Rock Farm
S
B
Fawn needs help!! Already lost one!!
Replies
3
Views
2K
Mikesmith79
M
F
For Sale 2020 FreMar Doe Fawns
Replies
1
Views
1K
FreMar Whitetails
F

Recent Discussions

Back
Top