Mark, Steven, Dennis, Virgil, and Jack
I like to see logical postings on this topic. There is a nice mix of ideas surfacing. I just want to add a couple more things to my last post.
1. The first rule in business is location, location, location. The first rule in deer farming ,ranching. breeding, or raising should be end market, end market, end market. Nobody I know would wish Jack's predicament on their worst enemy.
2. Measure twice, confidently promise, and over-deliver. This is what I do when it comes to shooters as well as breeding stock. When every shooter you sell is healthy and scores 3" to 7" (average of 5") higher than you told them, you will get you return customers. I have talked to end market guys later and when that gross score of 240" is as solid as granite it goes a long way in the future. They deserve to get what they ordered and they could care less about the sire of that buck they are buying.
3. I have customers like me (a small breeder) that have deer I keep track of that were born on my farm. These customers don't know it yet, but I am only breeding now to produce bucks to replace deer that they deem unsatisfactory. I will only breed one doe this year due to the fact she had a very nice buck fawn this year for me and I wouldn't mind getting another one. If these customers are satisfied with what they got from me, I keep the replacement deer and raise it myself. I call it the accountability factor. I learned this from an older gentleman from Indiana years ago that sold young bucks and guaranteed them to score 200" @ 4 or he would replace them. That was when feed prices were half the cost they are now. Good customer service is one thing that will never go out of style.
4. My smaller herd is allowing me to spend time on creating a larger end market in this area. I am working with landowners who are hunters that are tired of the over-harvest of young bucks in their area. They are also tired of seeing these clowns on TV shooting two yr. olds and hypeing themselves up. If they have the resources I am trying to convince them to fence off portions of their land, but not totally so it will allow young bucks to live longer. I am counting on them fencing off the whole thing in time when they finally realize their herd with age still won't produce the quality of deer they are looking for. I see in many areas that deer that are called wild are anything but wild. A better title is loose and under-managed with way too high of a doe to buck ratio. Baby steps to get the ball rolling I feel will work better than the one time large investment with some of these landowners. Meanwhile it keeps the perceived value of their land in their eyes high and less likely to be destroyed by a developer in the near future. In time managing sub-par deer will get old for them. I would be happy to assist them with their culling just to prove a point to them in the future. I will keep you posted on this project.