Just read through the thread. Interesting. Midwest has voice the opinion that I believe a lot of hunters have. In my opinion, it is fairly ignorant of most of the high fenced hunts that I know of. For instance, the home range of a whitetail deer is about 300 acres here in Texas, according to Texas A+M. SCI has a good definition for fair chase. Basically, if you can guarantee a specific animal, it is not fair chase. Certainly, there are bad ranches. And there are very bad public places, with tags that have to be drawn, and even a governor's tag that is for auction. The winner of that tag usually hires several guides, lets them do all the work, and then "hunts" the animal... My reason for hunting high fences?
1) Safer... the number and placement of hunters is controlled. That is not the case without a ranch manager. Yes, it is possible to do this on private land, but not on public land.
2) I don't have to deal with jerks. If a real jerk shows up at my ranch, I don't have to deal with him. But, on public land, i would.
3) more comfort. I like having a decent meal and a place to sleep at night. I spent far too many nights in North Dakota freezing my tail off, without a payout.
4) More and better game. Certainly, a high fenced place has a chance at being well managed. With feed, it can contain more game and better game. And the ratios can be to the health of the herd. IE: we take a lot of does. In CA, killing a doe is illegal. Hence, the deer herd is out of balance.
5) Healthier and older game. On a high fenced area, the owner keeps the hunter from shooting a promising 2 year or 3 year old. The deer are fed as necessary, sometimes wormed, basically, the owner takes pride in his herd. On public land, anything with a fork will get shot. So finding a 3 or 4 year old deer is unlikely. Just look at the records in CA. 90% of all deer taken are forked. only 2-3% are 4 points on a side...
6) I own my 1300 acres. I can hunt it without dealing with Joe Sixpack... If someone hunts my ranch, I form a personal relationship with that hunter, and have met several friends exactly this way.
Frankly, I am pretty sick of the argument in favor of "fair" chase or public land hunting. Public hunts are expensive per kill, expose the herd to unnecessary threats by removing only bucks or young bucks, expose the hunter to unnecessary threats from other hunters, and require draws. Most of the hunters that are against high fences act like "holier than thou" people that are better because they only hunt open land. But, since i offer both high fence and open land/fair chase/ hunts, you would be delighted to know that most hunters opt for the fence after less than a day of "fair chase"... Sorry for the rant, but this a real sore point with me,
Hardpan