Simple case where the government made all the rules, and now can't live by, or follow them, themselves. We ran into that here, when our state zoo asked to bring in unmonitored animals into the zoo. We granted them an exemption, but why doesn't a government entity have to live by the same rules we do??
One thing I want to point out about Brakke's. These animals were probably less than 5% clinical. These animals looked as healthy as any of ours. Around 51% tested brainstem positive. Which is by definition what is called a CWD positive. Around 28% of these animals where lymph node positive only. By definition, these animals did not have CWD!! They only carried the infectious agent that COULD HAVE turned into CWD. Would all of these animals turned into CWD positives? Without a live test there is no way to prove that. We have allowed the government to "assume this". Remember that 21% of the animals showed nothing!!! Were these animals resistant, or immune?? Would they have never got CWD?? They had the same exposure as the others. We missed a great opportunity in this herd for further research!!! When the first case was detected, a sampling of the herd showed a 7% lymph node [no positive brain stems] positive ONLY result. The preserve showed only a 3% infection rate after depopulation. Yet with these low rates they were still not allowed movement. That's a lot lower rate than the 30-40% rate at Wind Cave, and they didn't think that was a large rate of risk to release them to the wild. I'm getting tired of government double-standards.