I saw a DNR report several years ago that said that 79% of bucks in Minnesota were dead by 1 1/2 years. That means that only 21% made it to 2 years! How many of them made it to 3?
At our Deer Classic we have been floating the idea of releasing our deer to the wild. I bet 99% of the hunters would have signed a petition to allow us to sell deer to qualified land owners, for genetic improvement. The DNR would be totally opposed to this I know. They think we would be polluting their deer genetics. The DNR should be loving us and working with us instead of hating us. Can you imagine what would happen if a 270 - 320 inch deer was shot in the wild? It would be on the cover of every magazine. That area would be a destination point of all out-of-state trophy hunters. Since out-of-state tags cost around $500+, vs. local tags around $28. It would be a boom for the DNR, local economies, etc.
Our DNR has for over 30 years, allows buck hunting the first of week of November. This is a hunt during rut. With bow hunting earlier, and with rut hunting, the biggest bucks get shot off every year, before breeding season. Do they not think the hunters are passing on the smaller bucks, and shooting the larger bucks? With this practice, aren't they manipulating the genetics for smaller racks? Now they came up with the great idea of shooting only bucks with at least 4 points on one side. Now aren't they genetically manipulating the herd, to not have more than 8 points? You do enough generations of this, and they won't have bucks over 4X4. I had yearlings last year that were 7X7's, and 3X3's. So we as farmers would not breed with our 7X7's, but keep our 3X3's for breeders? The practice the DNR uses is completely backwards of what we do. Is it a wonder why we have blown the DNR deer away in just about 10 years of breeding? We could fix their mistakes [deer herd], in just 5 years! That's only if they would listen to us, and not practice their "tunnel vision".
Gary